Is SEBI's neglence Responsible for satyam
give Reply in Brief
Sameer Medhekar (Student) (4140 Points)
08 January 2009Is SEBI's neglence Responsible for satyam
give Reply in Brief
Prakash Popat
(3134 Points)
Replied 08 January 2009
Yes,They allow free fall whole day,They R inefficient Umpire/wellknown for unfair umpiring stadards.
CA Sudhir Halakhandi
(PRACTICING CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT)
(13401 Points)
Replied 08 January 2009
YES SATYAM SHOULD BE PUT UNDER VIGILLENCE WHEN WORLD BANK IMPOSED A BAN ON IT
CA CS CIMA Prakash Somani
(Landmark Group)
(23502 Points)
Replied 08 January 2009
It can only be said after an inquiry is being made in this matter. May be SEBI, Stoack Exchange, Auditors, Directors etc etc list not ends here....
Prakash Popat
(3134 Points)
Replied 08 January 2009
Immediate suspension of trading could be resorted by the SEBI/NSE,BUT not done so,and participate in the crime against INVESTORS,IF they did fair umpiring than they must allow INVESTORS to write call contract of 30-40-50.
Pratik K
(Student)
(3406 Points)
Replied 08 January 2009
kyu nahin bhai
SEBI hi nahi har aek istitution becomes responsible for that.
Are yar SEBI ne chaha hota to isaki trading 12 baje hi bandh kar sakata tha,ya fir short sell jo 125rs. se lekar Rs.31 tak huva tha woh rok sakata tha....
lekin kiya kisine....?
SEBI just said that they will investigate for isider trading but did they say what if any insider trading found then they will return money of the share holder or actual trader who lost in these deals.?
Ashish M
(Chartered Accountant)
(2731 Points)
Replied 09 January 2009
some tax experts has to say that sebi didn't put circuit breaker just to confirm and give oppourtunity to those who wants to go out of satyam shares must do so.......although the price was moving around Rs.100 at that time...and so as nobody could get locked in with the shares had their been put a breaker on the transaction of its shares...........
shailesh agarwal
(professional accountant)
(7642 Points)
Replied 15 January 2009
oh ya sebi is also resposible -he has to see quartely reports published strically -is they are reliable or not------qtr-reports -is treating by the companies -so casually as it is just formality.
CA. Rajeev Aggarwal
(Chartered Accountant)
(3424 Points)
Replied 15 January 2009
No, what sebi can do.
if raju is with intention to make farud
shailesh agarwal
(professional accountant)
(7642 Points)
Replied 16 January 2009
BY -MAKING RULE -TO PROVIDE -ATTESTED ----
SUPPORTINGS-FIGURES OF QUATERLY RESULTS PUBLISHED IN PAPER--I THINK
WE CAN TAKE SOME PRECAUTIONERY STEPS---TO AVOID -INCOMING-FRAUDS-------------------
AS I THINK
shailesh agarwal
(professional accountant)
(7642 Points)
Replied 18 January 2009
this is indian law -here invester lossed every thing in few minuts and accuesed-punisshed-------------------------if-----------after -----------a--------------long--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TIME.
Prakash Popat
(3134 Points)
Replied 19 January 2009
IF SEBI,Could not do Umpiring Well,SEBI must not Imposed Circuit Filter for other listed company and be party to the unfair Game/Umpiring.
Prakash Popat
(3134 Points)
Replied 19 January 2009
Don't Blame Raju who feed family of 53000 employees for so many years.Look Behind the Veil,You find Where Real Beauty Hide.
Landmark Judgments: Important Provisions of the EPF & ESI Act interpreted by the Honorable Supreme Court of India