Sir If it is Observed in CA Final Law Paper. Sylbs Mentions Allied Laws at 30 Marks Sylbs.
Now If you carefully see the Paper for Last 5 Attempts Even Incl this Paper. The Coverage is Either 22 marks or 38 Marks for Allied Laws. See How.
7 Ques Total Que 1 Compl & any 5 from 2 - 7
Allied Laws Coverage is 5 -6 Marks in Que No 1, In Que 3- 8 Marks, In Que 5 - 8 Marks & Question no 7 -16 Marks.
Considering that Q 1 is attempted as it is compulsary
Now if the Student leaves Quest No 7 as Optional he gets an attempt of only 21 -22 marks of Allied Laws.
Student leaves any one of Quest 2 or Quest 4 as Option, Then he Gets 37 - 38 Marks at Allied Laws
Only One condition that 30 Marks of Allied Laws gets covered is a Student leaving either Q 3 or 5 as Option then only the Sylbs of 30 Marks gets Covered.
The Moot point is that How can ICAI have such a disproportianate Distribution of Marks in the Paper compared to the Marks weightage Declared in the Sylbs.
If We consider that Q 1 -3 - 5 - 7 with any two from 2/4/6 are attempted student gets to attempt 62 of Corporate Law & 38 or Allied Laws.
Student Attempts Q 1 - 6 then he Gets 78 of Co Law & 22 of Allied Laws
ICAi is by itself Violating its Own declaration & Publication of the Marks covered & Distributed in the Sylbs.
ICAI is Cheating the Students by telling something & Giving something which is very different from which it has declared in Writing.
Lets take this Matter too with ICAI.
If this Matter is Taken ICAI will have to Allot 8 more Marks to every student this Time for this Disproportianate seggregation of Marks