Classification of Financial Liabilities :-AS 39 recognises two classes of financial liabilities:
§Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss.
§Other financial liabilities measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
The category of financial liability at fair value through profit or loss has two subcategories:
Designated. A financial liability that is designated by the entity as a liability at fair value through P/L upon initial recognition.
Held for trading. A financial liability classified as held for trading, such as an obligation for securities borrowed in a short sale, which have to be returned in the future.
Initial Recognition:-IAS 39 requires recognition of a financial asset or a financial liability when, and only when, the entity becomes a party to the contractual prov. of the instrument, subject to the following provisions in respect of regular way purchases
Initial Measurement :-Initially, financial assets and liabilities should be measured at fair value (including transaction costs, for assets and liabilities not measured at fair value through profit or loss).
Measurement Subsequent to Initial Recognition :-Subsequently, financial assets and liabilities (including derivatives) should be measured at fair value, with the following exceptions;
§Loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, and non-derivative financial liabilities should be measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
§Investments in equity instruments with no reliable fair value measurement (and derivatives indexed to such equity instruments) should be measured at cost.
§Financial assets and liabilities that are designated as a hedged item or hedging instrument are subject to measurement under the hedge accounting requirements of the IAS 39.
§Financial liabilities that arise when a transfer of a financial asset does not qualify for derecognition, or that are accounted for using the continuing-involvement method, are subject to particular measurement requirements.
Fair value is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length transaction. IAS 39 provides a hierarchy to be used in determining the fair value for a financial instrument:
§Quoted market prices in an active market are the best evidence of fair value and should be used, where they exist, to measure the financial instrument.
§If a market for a financial instrument is not active, an entity establishes f.v by using a valuation technique that makes maximum use of market inputs and includes recent arm's length market transactions, reference to the current fair value of another instrument that is substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis, and option pricing models. An acceptable valuation technique incorporates all factors that market participants would consider in setting a price and is consistent with accepted economic methodologies for pricing financial instruments.
§If there is no active market for an equity instrument and the range of reasonable fair values is significant and these estimates cannot be made reliably, then an entity must measure the equity instrument at cost less impairment.
§Amortised cost is calculated using the effective interest method. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or liability. Financial assets that are not carried at fair value though profit and loss are subject to an impairment test. If expected life cannot be determined reliably, then the contractual life is used.
Derecognition of a Financial Asset
§The basic premise for the derecognition model in IAS 39 is to determine
whether the asset under consideration for derecognition is:
§an asset in its entirety; or
§specifically identified cash flows from an asset; or
§a fully proportionate share of the cash flows from an asset; or
§a fully proportionate share of specifically identified cash flows from F.A.
§Once the asset under consideration for derecognition has been determined, an assessment is made as to whether the asset has been transferred, and if so, whether the transfer of that asset is subsequently eligible for derecognition.
§An asset is transferred if either the entity has transferred the contractual rights to receive the cash flows, or the entity has retained the contractual rights to receive the cash flows from the asset, but has assumed a contractual obligation to pass those cash flows on under an arrangement that meets the following three conditions: [IAS 39.17-19]
§the entity has no obligation to pay amounts to the eventual recipient unless it collects equivalent amounts on the original asset,
§the entity is prohibited from selling or pledging the original asset (other than as security to the eventual recipient), and
§the entity has an obligation to remit those cash flows without material delay.
§Once an entity has determined that the asset has been transferred, it then determines whether or not it has transferred substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset. If substantially all the risks and rewards have been transferred, the asset is derecognised. If substantially all the risks and rewards have been retained, derecognition of the asset is precluded.
§If the entity has neither retained nor transferred substantially all of the risks and rewards of the asset, then the entity must assess whether it has relinquished control of the asset or not. If the entity does not control the asset then derecognition is appropriate; however if the entity has retained control of the asset, then the entity continues to recognise the asset to the extent to which it has a continuing involvement in the asset
Derecognition of a Financial Liability
§A financial liability should be removed from the balance sheet when, and only when, it is extinguished, that is, when the obligation specified in the contract is either discharged, cancelled, or expired. Where there has been an exchange between an existing borrower and lender of debt instruments with substantially different terms, or there has been a substantial modification of the terms of an existing financial liability, this transaction is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original financial liability and the recognition of a new financial liability. A gain or loss from extinguishment of the original financial liability is recognised in the income statement
Hedge Accounting :-IAS 39 permits hedge accounting under certain circumstances provided that the hedging relationship is: formally designated and documented, including the entity's risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge, identification of the hedging instrument, the hedged item, the nature of the risk being hedged, and how the entity will assess the hedging instrument's effectiveness; and expected to be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows attributable to the hedged risk as designated and documented, and effectiveness can be reliably measured.
Hedging Instruments :-All derivative contracts with an external counterparty may be designated as hedging instruments except for some written options. An external non-derivative financial asset or liability may not be designated as a hedging instrument except as a hedge of foreign currency risk. A proportion of the derivative may be designated as the hedging instrument. Generally, specific cash flows inherent in a derivative cannot be designated in a hedge relationship while other cash flows are excluded. However, the intrinsic value and the time value of an option contract may be separated, with only the intrinsic value being designated. Similarly, the interest element and the spot price of a forward can also be separated, with the spot price being the designated risk.
Categories of Hedges
§A fair value hedge is a hedge of the exposure to changes in fair value of a recognised asset or liability or a previously unrecognised firm commitment to buy or sell an asset at a fixed price or an identified portion of such an asset, liability or firm commitment, that is attributable to a particular risk and could affect profit or loss. The gain or loss from the change in fair value of the hedging instrument is recognised immediately in profit or loss. At the same time the carrying amount of the hedged item is adjusted for the corresponding gain or loss with respect to the hedged risk, which is also recognised immediately in net P/L
§A cash flow hedge is a hedge of the exposure to variability in cash flows that (i) is attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognised asset or liability (such as all or some future interest payments on variable rate debt) or a highly probable forecast transaction and (ii) could affect profit or loss. The portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument that is determined to be an effective hedge is recognised directly in equity and recycled to the income statement when the hedged cash transaction affects profit or loss. If a hedge of a forecast transaction subsequently results in the recognition of a financial asset or a financial liability, any gain or loss on the hedging instrument that was previously recognised directly in equity is 'recycled' into profit or loss in the same period(s) in which the financial asset or liability affects profit or loss.
Discontinuation of Hedge Accounting
Hedge accounting must be discontinued prospectively if:
§the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised;
§the hedge no longer meets the hedge accounting criteria -
§for cash flow hedges the forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur;
§the entity revokes the hedge designation.
§For the purpose of measuring the carrying amount of the hedged item when fair value hedge accounting ceases, a revised effective interest rate is calculated.