Guarantee commission to director

1775 views 3 replies

A private limited company which is subsidiary of a Foriegn Company (holding 51% of the capital). The balance 49% is held by an Indian unlisted public Company. By virtue of Section 4 subsection 7 of Companies Act, the Company is treated as subsidiary of a Public Company.

The Company has 6 directors, 3 Indian and 3 Foreign Director. Of the three Indian Directors one is a MD. All the Directors including the MD are non-executive and not drawing any remuneration.

The Indian Directors have provided their personal guarantee for the credit facility and the company now wants to pay commission to the Indian Directors, including the MD for providing personal guarantee.

The DCA has issued a circular on basis of a Delhi High Court Judgment that payment of guarantee commission to Director is not remuneration within the meaning of Section 309. Extract of the explanation of the same is given below for your perusal:

The Department had issued earlier Circular No. 14/50-CL.V, dated 16-12-1969 according to which guarantee commission payable to the directors for personal guarantee on loans to the company was to be treated as remuneration under section 309(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. In Sussen Textile Bearings Ltd. v Union of India reported in (1984) 55 Comp Cas 492, it was held by Delhi High Court that guarantee Commission paid by a company to its director for standing surety for loans and credit facilities taken by the company was not a remuneration within the meaning of section 309 of the Companies Act, 1956 and approval of the Central Government was not necessary. [Circular No. 3/94 (F. No. 14/3/87-CL.V), dated 16-2-1994]

Request your kind advise if we can pay guarantee commission to the Indian non-executive Directors and MD.

Replies (3)

Dear Ruchie,

 

In terms of the said circular, and the judgement by the Delhi High Court, The directors rendering guarantee does not render manual, clerical, technical, supervisory or administrative service. He gets the commission for the risk which he bears and that has nothing to do with his directorship.

 

Hence, according to me, the payment can be made.

 

but I did not understand, one thing that how come the MD is a Non Executive Director....Chairman may be Non Exec. but MD?/ I dont think so...

Many Thanks Ankit for your reply..

The MD is a executive director but not drawing any remneration from the Company.

Just needed a clarification that this commission will form a part of commission to directors u/s. 309 and hence limits thereof will apply??

Regards,

Ruchie Khanna

 

Dear Ruchie,

you are welcome...

In terms of the circular and the judgement, I dont think the limits would apply...

have also sent you a Pvt. Msg..pls check

 

- Ankit


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register