Fee U/S 234F
Page no : 2
Varun Chauhan
(22 Points)
Replied 07 April 2021
Not correct in charging fees u/s 234F, as the revised return replace the original return and it is deemed to be filed on the date of original return.
CA Chirag J Nakrani
(C J NAKRANI & ASSOCIATES)
(25 Points)
Replied 07 April 2021
If it was made defective then how come you say before passing the order???
If it was made defective and you didn't answer / revised it before expiry of given time then of course order is confirmed and your return will be treated as defective.
If it was made defective and you didn't answer / revised it before expiry of given time then of course order is confirmed and your return will be treated as defective.
Varun Chauhan
(22 Points)
Replied 07 April 2021
If it is defective then it will be assumed as no return is filed and accordingly department is correct in charging fees u/s 234 F.
Nidhi
(Chief Accountant)
(3150 Points)
Replied 11 April 2021
It's not correct, required to be rectify.
Recent Topics
- Avoiding tax audit in case of intraday equity loss
- Form 3CEAB
- Form 3CEAA and Form 3CEAB
- DIR 3 Web KYC
- Can i declare LTCG income as business income if I
- Stock entry in new software
- I have an EMI collection shop, what is its SAC cod
- Making payment once in quarter possible under QRMP
- Master File Documentation related
- Applicability of 44AD needs clarification
Related Threads
CAclubindia
