A number of issues have been raised by trade and industry at different fora after the presentation of the Finance Bill, 2007, after its enactment and also after the notification of Rule 40C. The questions and answers in the following section seek to clarify these issues:
1. Whether a foreign company is liable to pay FBT on shares allotted or transferred to the employees of its Indian subsidiary?
Answer In terms of the provisions of Chapter XII-H of the Act, an employer, being a company, is liable to pay FBT in respect of the fringe benefits provided or deemed to have been provided by it to its employees, directly or indirectly, during the previous year. Since the shares are allotted or transferred to employees of the Indian subsidiary, by virtue of their employment with the subsidiary company, the liability to pay fringe benefit tax on such shares vests upon the Indian subsidiary and not on the foreign company.
2. Whether charge back of costs by the foreign company to the Indian subsidiary is relevant to determine the obligation of the Indian company to pay FBT?
Answer: As stated in answer No.1, the Indian subsidiary is liable to fringe benefit tax irrespective of whether or not there is a charge back of cost by the foreign holding company.
3. Will FBT apply in case of employees of the Indian subsidiary for shares awarded by the foreign holding company if the employees of the Indian subsidiary are allotted or transferred shares while outside India?
Answer: In the answer to Question No.20 of CBDT Circular No. 8/2005 dt.
29.8.2005, it has been clarified that an employer is liable to fringe benefit tax on the value of fringe benefits provided or deemed to have been provided to employees based in India. Therefore, an Indian subsidiary would be liable to pay FBT in respect of the value of the shares allotted or transferred by the foreign holding company if the employee was based in India at any time during the period beginning with the grant of the option and ending with the date of vesting of such option (hereafter such period is referred to as ‘grant period’), irrespective of the place of location of the employee at the time of allotment or transfer of such shares.
4. How will the value of fringe benefit be determined in case where the employee was based in India only for a part of the grant period?
Answer: In a case where the employee was based in India only for a part of grant period, a proportionate amount of the value of the fringe benefit will be liable to FBT. The proportionate amount shall be determined by applying to the value of the fringe benefit, the proportion which the length of the period of stay in India by the employee during the grant period bears to the length of the grant period.
(The value of fringe benefit means the fair market value of the specified security or sweat equity shares, on the date on which the option vests with the employee, as reduced by the amount actually paid by, or recovered from, the employee in respect of such shares.)
5. Whether a foreign company is liable to fringe benefit tax in respect of shares allotted or transferred to an employee who is deputed to work in India in the year of such allotment or transfer?
Answer: A foreign company is liable to FBT in respect of shares allotted or transferred to its employee who is based in India. However, in such cases only a proportionate amount of the value of the fringe benefit will be liable to FBT. The proportionate value shall be determined
by applying to the value of the fringe benefit, the proportion which the length of the period of stay in India by the employee during the grant period bears to the length of the grant period.
(The value of fringe benefit means the fair market value of the specified security or sweat equity shares, on the date on which the option vests with the employee, as reduced by the amount actually paid by, or recovered from, the employee in respect of such shares.)
6. What will be the cost of acquisition of shares, referred to in question nos 4 and 5, where only a proportionate value of fringe benefit has been subjected to FBT?
Answer:- In accordance with section 49 (2AB) of the Act, the cost of acquisition of such shares shall be the fair market value on the date on which the option vests with the employee. The calculation of fringe benefit for the purpose of determining FBT does not change this value. Hence, the subsequent calculation of reducing such fair market value by the amount actually paid by or recovered from the employee as well as the calculation of proportionate value in certain
cases, referred to in Question No.4 & 5 above, will not change the cost of acquisition.
7. Where the benefit on account of shares allotted or transferred under Employee Stock Option Plans (ESOPs) is taxed in the hands of the employees in different countries, would the employer still be liable to FBT? If yes, can the employer claim credit for payment of tax by the employee in other countries?
Answer: Employer will be liable to FBT in India irrespective of whether employees have been charged to tax in different countries or not. An employer cannot claim any credit in India against its FBT liability for taxes paid by employees in other countries.
8. Where FBT, on account of shares allotted or transferred under ESOPs, has been paid by the employer in respect of an employee based in India and subsequently recovered from him, can such employee claim credit in a foreign country for this FBT paid by the employer in India?
Answer: Ordinarily, the employee is liable to tax in respect of fringe benefits received by him from his employer. However, the taxation of fringe benefits in the hands of the employee raises several problems. Accordingly, it was decided to introduce FBT as a surrogate tax on employer in respect of the fringe benefits provided or deemed to have been provided by it to its employees during the previous year. This being so, in a case where FBT, on account of share allotted or transferred ESOPs, has been paid by the employer in respect of an employee based in India and subsequently recovered from him; the FBT is effectively paid by the employee in respect of fringe benefits enjoyed by him. Therefore, such employee can claim credit, in a foreign country, for the FBT, on account of shares allotted or transferred under ESOPs, paid by the employer in India.
9. Whether the benefits arising on account of shares allotted ortransferred under ESOPs can be taxed as a perquisite under section 17 of the Act instead of being taxed as fringe benefit under Chapter XII-H of the said Act, at the option of the employer?
Answer: Any fringe benefit liable to be taxed in the hands of the employer under Chapter XII-H of the Act cannot be taxed in the hands of the employee as a perquisite under section 17 of the said Act. Therefore, an employer does not have an option to tax the benefit arising on account of shares allotted or transferred under ESOPs as perquisite which otherwise is to be taxed as fringe benefit.
10. Whether there will be any FBT liability in a case where the FMV on the date of vesting is less than the price paid by the employee to the employer for allotment or transfer of shares?
Answer: No. FBT would not be payable in such cases.
11. What will be the valuation methodology for foreign companies if the shares are not listed in a recognized stock exchange in India but are listed on any globally recognised stock exchange?
Answer: If the shares are not listed in a recognized stock exchange in India,the shares will be treated as unlisted. Accordingly, such shares will have to be valued by category 1 Merchant Banker registered with Securities and Exchange Board of India. However, if the shares are listed in any globally recognised stock exchange, the merchant banker shall use the listed price as one of the basis for valuation and recommend the best value.
12. Whether an independent valuation carried by any foreign merchant banker/other experts as recognized for the purposes of valuation in the foreign country be treated as sufficient compliance for the purposes of valuation of fringe benefit arising on account of allotment or transfer of shares under ESOPs of an unlisted foreign company or is it mandatory that the merchant banker should be registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India.
Answer: For the purposes of valuation of fringe benefit arising on account of allotment or transfer of shares under ESOPs of an unlisted foreign company, it is mandatory for the valuer to be a category I Merchant Banker registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India.
13. When there exists different methods for valuing FMV for unlisted companies, which method should be used by the merchant bankers to determine the FMV?
Answer: The Merchant Banker should determine the FMV on the basis of alternative methods and recommend the most appropriate value.
14. What is the significance of specified date? Whether the valuation is to be made on a specified date or specified security or sweat equity share is to be valued as on the specified date?
Answer: The process of valuation may be carried out by the merchant banker at any time before or after the date of vesting of the option, but the specified security or the sweat equity share is required to be valued as on the specified date.
15. What is the FMV that a company should adopt if the shares have been valued by more than one merchant banker or by one merchant banker on more than one occasion?
Answer: The valuation which value the specified security or sweat equity share on the specified date, which is closest to the date of the vesting of the option, should be adopted, if the shares have been valued by more than one Merchant Banker or by one Merchant Banker on more than one occasion.
16. Whether the fringe benefit arising on account of shares allotted or transferred under an ESOP is allowed as deduction in calculating the taxable income of the employer company?
Answer: In case where the employer purchases the shares and then subsequently transfers such shares to its employees, the expenditure so incurred is allowable as deduction in computing the
taxable income of the employer company. However, if the shares are allotted to the employees from the share capital of the company, no deduction is allowable in computing the taxable
income of the company since no expenditure has been incurred by it.
17. Whether ESOPs issued to non-executive directors or non- employees liable to FBT?
Answer: Benefit arising out of ESOPs issued to non-employees will not be liable to FBT. However, in such cases, the taxability of such benefits in the hands of the non-employees will be determined in accordance with the existing law.
18. Which method, first-in-first-out (FIFO) or last-in-first-out (LIFO)shall be followed in case there are multiple date of vesting for different number of shares. For example if the dates of vesting are:
31 Mar 06 - 300 options - FMV Rs. 8 per share ( one share per option)
31 Mar 07 - 300 options - FMV Rs. 9 per share ( one share per option) and the employee is allotted 500 shares as on 30 September 2007, how will FBT be calculated?
Answer: In such cases, the First-in-First-Out (FIFO) method shall be followed. Hence, the FBT shall be calculated with respect to 300 shares at FMV of Rs 8 per share and 200 shares at FMV of Rs 9 per shares.
19. Whether it is binding upon the Assessing Officer to accept the valuation made by the merchant banker?
Answer: It is binding upon the Assessing Officer to accept the valuation made by the Merchant Banker unless the valuation by such banker is perverse.
20. How would the recovery of FBT be treated in the hands of the employer?
Answer: Since FBT is not an allowable deduction in computation of the income of the employer, any recovery of FBT will not be treated as income in his hands.
21. What should be the mechanism and timing of recovery of FBT?
Answer: The law does not provide for any specific mechanism or timing of recovery of FBT.
22. Is it lawful for the employer to recover FBT with respect to ESOPs granted prior to April 1, 2007?
Answer: It would be lawful for the employer to recover FBT with respect to ESOPs granted prior to April 1, 2007, but allotted or transferred to the employee after such date.
23. What will be the date of allotment of an Employee Stock Option?
Answer: The date of allotment of an Employee Stock Option shall be the date on which the underlying asset is allotted or transferred to the employee
24. Whether the FBT recovered from the employee would form the cost basis for employee for calculating Capital Gain on subsequent sale of shares?
Answer: No. The recovery of FBT from the employee by the employer will not change the cost of acquisition of the shares in the hand of the employee.
25. Will Rule 40C of Income-tax Rules, shall also apply in a case where shares are allotted or transferred to an employee under “Employee Stock Purchase Plan”, or “Employee Stock Option Scheme”, or “Employee Stock Ownership Plan”, or “Employee Stock Purchase Scheme”, or “Employee Stock Option Scheme” or “Employee Appreciation Rights or Plans”?
Answer: Rule 40C shall apply in all cases where specified security or sweat equity shares, being shares in a company, are allotted or transferred to an employee under any scheme or plan or otherwise.For the purpose of this circular an Employees’ Stock Option Plan shall include all such schemes or plans, etc. "
CAclubindia
