Dear All
" Mr X, a director of XYZ Pvt Ltd , is 59% stakeholder in it. There are other individual board members also. Is he legally required to declare to the Board that his sister is an employee of the Company ?"
CA Mallika Chaudhary (CWA Final and CA) (418 Points)
15 October 2010Dear All
" Mr X, a director of XYZ Pvt Ltd , is 59% stakeholder in it. There are other individual board members also. Is he legally required to declare to the Board that his sister is an employee of the Company ?"
Puneet
(learner)
(105 Points)
Replied 16 October 2010
Hello
in my personal opinion a special resolution is required for the appointment of a relative of a director at an office or place of profit carrying a monthly remunaration of rs 10000 or more.
So here they need to pass A Special Resolution to appoint his sister as an employee if she gets remunaration more than 10000.
CA Mallika Chaudhary
(CWA Final and CA)
(418 Points)
Replied 16 October 2010
Any relevant section... ?? Coz i cud not find the limit and the clause u mentioned above anywhere....
Thanx for the reply !!!
rvsekar2000
(212 Points)
Replied 16 October 2010
SECTION 314 (1) (B) APPLIES TO ALL COMPANIES INCLUDING PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANIES.
R.V.Seckar
Pl do visit my blogs :https://rvsekar.blogspot.com/
https://rvseckarfema.blogspot.com/
Ankur Garg
(Company Secretary and Compliance Officer)
(114773 Points)
Replied 16 October 2010
Trust my reply to your profile would be of some help...
CA Mallika Chaudhary
(CWA Final and CA)
(418 Points)
Replied 16 October 2010
Originally posted by : Ankur Garg | ||
Trust my reply to your profile would be of some help... |
It helped allot Sir !!! I understood the condition of "contract or arrangements" u/s 297 of the Act only after I read your post today !!! Thanks allot !!! I had got confused due to the case law of A. Sivasailam which was referred to in many of the books as the basis for disclosure of Interest by the Director u/s 299 of the Act...it was about the employment of his daughter in the Company.
Thanks allot Sir for your reply !!!
CA Mallika Chaudhary
(CWA Final and CA)
(418 Points)
Replied 17 October 2010
@ RV Sekar Sir & Ankur Sir
I was referring to Section 297 & 299 for the case above. But, Section 314 is more relevant. Is this correct ?