Ad Free CAclubindia and Daily Updates on your Mobile. Subscribe Now!

Do you know POTA law???

CA CS CIMA Prakash Somani (Landmark Group) (23502 Points)

15 September 2008

What do you know about POTA law??

Should it be bring back into force???

_________________________________

Please provide your valuable feedback. Who knows our opinions are worth millions !!!

:)cheers:)

Reply
Follow
Share

3 Replies

Ravi Satpal (CA (Final) & CS (Executive) Student) (2430 Points)
Replied 15 September 2008

since POTA is very strict law..it shd be implied but surely wid some amendments...

Upgrade to CAclubindia Pro. Subscribe Now!

CA CS CIMA Prakash Somani (Landmark Group) (23502 Points)
Replied 15 September 2008

What is full form?

Prevention of Terrorism Act

When did POTA come into force?

In June 2002.

What prompted the Vajpayee government to enact this anti-terror legislation?

The September 11 terrorist attacks on the United States constituted the main reason. Several terrorist attacks, especially in the troubled state of Jammu and Kashmir, and the attempt to storm Parliament in New Delhi quickened the pace of enactment of POTA. The act replaced an earlier anti-terrorism law known as the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, which was allowed to lapse by the P V Narasimha Rao government back in 1995.

Vajpayee's government said POTA was India's boldest initiative to fight terrorism, disband terrorist outfits, and choke terror funding.

What were the salient features of POTA?

It allowed the detention of a suspect for up to 180 days without the filing of charges in court. It also allowed law enforcement agencies to withhold the identities of witnesses and treats a confession made to the police as an admission of guilt. Under regular Indian law, a person can deny such confessions in court, but not under POTA.

How many arrests were made under POTA in the last two years?

According to the Union home ministry, some 800 people have been arrested and jailed under POTA. Some 4,000 people from across country were also booked under the Act.

How many arrests were made under POTA's predecessor, TADA?

From 1984 onwards, some 75,000 people were detained all over India under TADA. Of these, 73,000 cases had to be subsequently withdrawn for lack of evidence.

But, strangely, though TADA was repealed long ago, there are still prisoners languishing in jails in India under this Act. For instance, there are 14 TADA prisoners still in Patna jail, according to Mukundan C Menon, secretary general of the Confederation of Human Rights Organisations.

So even after POTA's repeal, those arrested under this Act will stay in jail?

Probably. After POTA is repealed, the law will not be used to make any new arrests. But those already arrested under POTA will continue to fight their cases under this law and remain in jail.

Home Minister Shivraj Patil has, however, promised that a special review committee will decide the future of all pending POTA cases within a year.

In which state was the maximum number of arrests made under POTA?

No, it is not Jammu and Kashmir, as you may have thought, but Jharkhand that saw the largest number of arrests under POTA. Some 250 people have been jailed under the law in this eastern state.

Why Jharkhand?

The state government claims that POTA has been widely used in many parts of Jharkhand to curb the Naxalite menace. But human rights activists say POTA has been misused in Jharkhand against poor, low-caste, tribal people and farmers and villagers who support Naxal groups.

Which was the most famous arrest under POTA?

The most high profile POTA arrest has not been of any terrorist, but of Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam leader V Gopalasamy aka Vaiko. Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa got Vaiko arrested under POTA for making a public speech in support of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.

Has the government banned any organisation under POTA?

The Vajpayee government banned 32 organisations under the anti-terrorism legislation.

Will the ban on these organisations be lifted now?

The ban under POTA will go. But the government will enforce a ban on extremist organisations under the provisions of other criminal laws, notably the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, which is to be amended.

Now that POTA is being repealed, how will the government control terrorism?

The Manmohan Singh government is contemplating alternative measures to check terrorism, the details of which have not been decided yet. But cracking down on terror funding, which has emerged as a major security threat, tops the agenda.

Does any law exist now to check such funding?

There is the Foreign Exchange Management Act, said to be India's most stringent law dealing with foreign exchange transactions. But FEMA is saddled with a big drawback. The Act does not grant the Enforcement Directorate powers to arrest and prosecute money launderers. Thus hawala, or illegal foreign exchange transactions, goes on unabated in India.

POTA was the only law dealing explicitly with terror funding in addition to other aspects of terrorism. Officials say that after it is repealed, the government may amend FEMA to make it more stringent. The amended Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act will also have provisions to check the funding of terrorist groups.

Will the government initiate any other anti-terror law to replace POTA?

It is unlikely that a new anti-terror law will be enacted after the many controversies that POTA and, before it, TADA generated. The new Congress-led government's argument is that India already has a number of stringent laws like the National Security Act and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act to check terrorism.

(Guest)

Such a strong law will only be miused by the officials we have seen it in Jharkhand we have seen it in gujarat where innocent muslims where taken into remand under POTA. there is nothing wrong in the law on paper the fault lies in its implementation. i still believe in india such a law will give too much power to the police men and believe me power corrupts. We wouldnt need POTA if our police forces are efficient enough. PPL as i see it tommo. one of u can be taken into custody and will be forced into a fake confession which will taken as proof in th court of law that sounds scary to me what will be so democratic about our country if there are laws like POTA i may be wrong but this im my point of view