Well!! the exams are over, atleast one reason to rejoice. About the papers in the CA Final Nov 2008 examinations, here are my views...
Accounts - The paper was tough... Lets admit it. Consolidation problem was not that anybody liked to appear in that exam. I coule complete the reconstruction problem and the theory well. AS 20 Problem was a definate Bouncer. The paper wanted to prove the fact that u need substance to clear a CA final paper.
MAFA - Moderately easy paper. Expected questions came. leasing and portfolio Mgt was a cakewalk. I should get an exemption god willing.
Audit - The paper was technical, especially the Professional Ethics quesstions and the AS questions. Fared pretty well, god willingly should get an exemption.
C Law - The examiner expected the students to display sound basic knowledge in most of the questions. The application of multiple sections in a few scenarios made the paper technical. It looked to be an easy paper it was however not.
Cost - Lets admit, this paper was easy. All repeated questions, it was however a lengthy paper.I guess a 70 mark attepmt should get you close to 55 or above.
MICS - Reasonably easy paper, it required sound basic knowledge though. Anyone who has read the Study material a couple of times and has given relevant answers would be able to score an easy 50.
DT - Very Technical Paper as always. Examiner expected professional approach to all answers. absence of CG and PGBP made the paper a tough nut to crack. The questions based on Income tax Authorities and assessment procedures were tough. WT was easy as always.
IDT - I felt that it was a very abnormal and procedure oriented paper. The basics of Excise was left out. IDT wont be the cause of many exemptions this attempt.
At the end of it all, we've all tried our best. The results matter but it does not bring us to a dead end. This course has thought us to be resilient and strong and so will we be. Here's wishing you the very best for your results. God bless the institute and all of us.