Discuss and download Final Q paper exam question paper May 2014

Page no : 4

upensmarty (...) (77 Points)
Replied 03 June 2014

M frustrated vry deeply due 2 this exam Paper bhut lenght tha jldbazi me sb galat ho gya :"(

Upgrade to CAclubindia Pro. Subscribe Now!

Deepali Doshi (Student CA Final ) (11 Points)
Replied 03 June 2014

Honestly paper was nt tough....bt yes it was very lengthy....god only knows what Institute is upto...

pooja (article) (37 Points)
Replied 03 June 2014

Cost Paper was Damn lengthy... 5 marks for such long sums.. The crashing sum deserved much more

Sourav (Achieving d UnAchieved) (991 Points)
Replied 03 June 2014

Few sums like ABC, crashing etc were damm easy, but the paper was too too too too too lengthy......... Probably no one can attempt more than 75-80 marks.....

yash mundra (CA) (103 Points)
Replied 03 June 2014

i bet without seeing the answer even paper setters can"t solve todays paper,.this is ICAI strategy for 2% result...Modi ji hamare ache din kab aaynge???

Upgrade to CAclubindia Pro. Subscribe Now!

Shantanu Kothari (CA-Final) (27 Points)
Replied 03 June 2014

Paper was too too too lengthy - Yes

Paper was tought - No

Even theory questions were asked practically..... That made paper even lengthier and it was all too logical... but with 3 hours to go, logic never appears...

kauni abedi (245) (28 Points)
Replied 03 June 2014

Maine toh sirf 56 marks ka attempt kiya....but still want to pass..don't want to study again ...:-(

Hari (Student CA Final ) (32 Points)
Replied 03 June 2014

How was the CA final Corporate and Allied Laws Paper.

S.GANESAN (AUDIT MANAGER) (110 Points)
Replied 03 June 2014

AMA is lenghty paper. Theory Questions r easy.

Anyway lets see the Paper Valuation & the Result.

butta singh (student) (23 Points)
Replied 03 June 2014

too lenthy

Upgrade to CAclubindia Pro. Subscribe Now!

Anand Mundra (Article) (32 Points)
Replied 04 June 2014

in question 3(a), RST Ltd., first of all i compared the sales, material, OH, etc of 2013 with the revised sales, material, OH, etc of 2013 at prices of 2014 (to get the variance due to price) and then compared the revised values with actual figures of 2014 (to get the variance due to change in volume). Is the sum correct to any extent..???

CS Piyush Jain (Practising Company Secretary) (1841 Points)
Replied 04 June 2014

yes anand bro .. the ques was correct .. though we are not given abt quant or price we can any one of the variance either price or volume .. in mat either eff or price .. then we has to reconcile the actual profit given in ques with the budget what we had calculated from data given

1 Like