my question is what is law not what we r doing ever person is his opinion and my question is what law about it you say gst including turnover my question is this correct method or not if correct then some where in law mentioned the same by rule by notification or circulation
It is a matter of litigation. For the same product URD has advantage of turnover without tax and registered dealer has to add tax for presumptive taxation.
Simply because of opting for presumptive taxation it doesn't mean that the particular assessee cannot produce the bifurcation between taxable value and tax collected. It just means that the assessee doesn't maintain complete set of books of accounts as done by others who are required to get their books audited or that he has opted 44AD. And the production of such bifurcation will not violate 44AD. There are number of CA offices where books are prepared and return filed under 44AD. 44AD is an option. That's it. Eventhough you maintain complete set of books of accounts, you are eligible to opt 44AD. There is no restriction on opting 44AD when books are maintained. Please find attached the bare section. It never says if you maintain books or produce bifurcation you will be denied opting 44AD.
If GST recovered from customer is credited to Current Liability Accounts (Output CGST or Output IGST or Output SGST) and payments to the authority are also debited to the said separate account, these should not form part of turnover shown in profit and loss account, so the turnover has to be seen exclusive of taxes.