Job
357 Points
Joined April 2012
Hello Mr. Ankit,
Please find the relevant provisions & explanation for your doubt
Dividend
As per section 2(22)(d) of Income Tax Act, 1961, any distribution by a company to its shareholders on the reduction of capital is treated as dividend to the extent the company possess accumulated profits (whether capitalilsed or not) and hence the subsidiary company is liable to pay dividend tax u/s115O & in the hands of recipient shareholders, it is not chargeable to tax
Capital Gains
As per section 2(47) of Income Tax Act, 1961, the word transfer includes relinquishment of the asset or the extinguishment of any rights thereon & the words "relinquishment" & "extinguishment" not defined under the Act.
In the case of Kartikeya V. Sarabhai vs. CIT (1997), Supreme Court held that the reduction in the face value of shares amounted to ‘extinguishment’ within the meaning of Section 2(47) and hence the amount received on such reduction was taxable as capital gain.
Section 47(iv)
As per section 47(iv) of Income Tax Act, 1961, any transfer of a capital asset by a company to its subsidiary company would not be treated as transfer, if -
- The parent company or its nominees hold the whole of the share capital of the subsidiary company, and
- Subsidiary company is an Indian company
Hence, there is no question of any benefit since there is reduction of capital by a 100% subsidiary co. and not by holding co.