Dear Nicky Sir,
I got ur concern....
But before I reply to that I would like you to answer the difference in these two scenarios
1) Expenditure debited to P/L A/c & then dissallowed in the computation
2) Expenditure not debited to P/L A/c & hence not claimed at all
For me there is no difference at all in the above two situations.....bottom line is in both cases deduction was denied. May be I am overlooking something..
If I am not wrong the reason for ur stand is the case of Noble Hewiit (Delhi HC)...But sir that case was different the judgment was in respect of service tax being collected from customers as a part of revenue & the decision was that since it was neither credited to P/L a/c nor debited to P/L A/c then the question of dissallowance dos not arise.
Further Sec 43B never requires that an assesee should first claim the expense & then dissallow it (In fact the word dissallow is not there in the section)-
Extract of Sec 43B -
"Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act a deduction otherwise allowable under this Act in respect of— .........................................
.....................................
shall be allowed (irrespective of the previous year in which the liability to pay such sum was incurred by the assessee according to the method of accounting regularly employed by him) only in computing the income referred to in section 28 of that previous year in which such sum is actually paid by him "
Sir, I hope the above clarifies ur doubt..