| Originally posted by : Devang Gajjar | ||
 |
As per AS-10 on "Fixed Assets", if any expenditure has increased the efficiency or useful life of the asset then it must be Capitalized and if not then charge it to P&L A/c. |
 |
ayushee dey
(CA Final Student)
(161 Points)
Replied 13 June 2011
| Originally posted by : Devang Gajjar | ||
|
|
As per AS-10 on "Fixed Assets", if any expenditure has increased the efficiency or useful life of the asset then it must be Capitalized and if not then charge it to P&L A/c. |
|
RAM BURRI
(FINANCE & ACCOUNTS )
(21 Points)
Replied 13 June 2011
As per AS-10 Fixed Assets, any amount spent for the long term benfit should be considered as Capital Expenditure. Therefore, the amount spent for the Building is a Capital Expenditure which should be Capitalise fully.
Somaas Kandan
(CA Final)
(385 Points)
Replied 15 June 2011
Thanks all.
But what should be the treatment for the assets which was destroyed in fire?
Purushottam
(CA Final)
(85 Points)
Replied 16 June 2011
If the new asset has come into existence and expenditure has really increased the efficiency of the existing asset whatever it would be irrespective of the amount of expenditure should be capitalised.
@*CS Siddharth Bumb. *
(B.Com, CA Final, CS )
(5270 Points)
Replied 18 June 2011
huge renovation of wrk will be capitalised against old one which was destroyed..
GSTR 9 and 9C for FY 23-24 as amended by Notification 12/2024 dated 10th July 2024(with recording)
CAclubindia
