In case of family settlement the following case law is relevant:
IN THE PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT AT
CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 10.01.2013 ITA No.353 of 2011
Commissioner of Income Tax II, Jalandhar¦Appellant
Versus
Ashwani Chopra¦Respondent
we find that the payment of Rs.24 crores to Group A is to equalize the inequalities in partition of the assets of M/s Hind Samachar Ltd. The amount so paid is immovable property. If such amount is to be treated as income liable to tax, the inequalities would set in as the share of the recipient will diminish to the extent of tax. Since the amount paid during the course of partition is to settle the inequalities in partition, therefore deemed to be immovable property. Such amount is not an income liable to tax. Thus, the amount of owelty i.e. compensation deposited by Group B is to equalize the partition represents immovable property and will not attract capital gain.