This is related to a shipping company which clear the port related activities with the help of agent at port (port charges, container handling charges, container storage charges etc) Port raise the bill in the name of Agent with service tax. And agent raises the bill for reimbursement of the same without service tax. And therefore currently company not taking the credit of such huge amount paid indirectly as service tax. And we raised the same issue in our audit report. My question is how to explain to department about the same issue. Any case law? or any more suggestions?
1 Replies
Madhukar N Hiregange
(Chartered Accountant)
(39034 Points)
Replied 08 June 2010
The name of the ultimate cusotmer if on all the invoices raised by the shipping company. + the link to the invoice by the agent who gets the same reimbursed should be enough.
The problem is that the agent normally adds a margin. If so then he maybe hit by rule 5 (1) of the ST Valuation rules.
Recent Topics
- Rectification to decrease income in SCHEDULE OS
- Can Statutory Auditor of a subsidiary become concu
- Client Asking for the Revised Invoice
- Share office desk in bkc, near family court
- 80D claim for payment paid by parent
- TDS on purchase of Flat under subvention scheme be
- Iska djd djrbdsjebshe sir ur rei ejr reinr the jr
- GST registration for medical shop in Karnataka
- Hsshs me know if you are free number of the
- Chu Kang and the situation of the situation and I
Related Threads
CAclubindia
