CA NEW results

everybody who writes the exam says he has done very well... he has high expectations. examiner alone knows what mistake one ahs done. one cant be guided by what these people say. someone who has not written anythin will also say he expects 60 and 70. how can the institute be held responsible for all this.

hi boss, dont put ur effort to know all these nonsense things how institute will give result, put the same effort in getting good marks. Its not my advice. its my suggestion as a friend. and also dont think our institute is wrong in that issue.........

no yar , pathan is rig ICAI should clear their doubt by giving their valuated papers copy. and by publishing the answerbooks of rankers. ht to some extent.

WHY CPT PAPER WAS OUT LAST TIME FOR SOME DIRTY BUCKS? WHATS THIS? PATHAN IS CORRECT.

Hi, boss its the common thing in CA. we all know that it is a good course.. if u r pass means defenately their should be your effort as well luck. but don't think ICAI is creating non sense... eventhough i failed...

Pathan is VERY CORRECT. icai should issue answerbook at demand.

Dear friends,can any of you tell me of which text i should study for infotech(pe-ll). This time i failed and i am planning to write GRP-ll in may 2008 & GRP-l in nov 2008 in the PCC scheme. IS MY PLANNING GOOD ? PLEASE REPLY FRIENDS...........

CORRECT PATHAN

I agree with you Pathan. "I passed with just few marks , i dont know how i got"-Thats my freind who said he would get 20 in IT but got 45!!! and cleared. "some others tell that i am very clar that i will not fail but then "- Thats Me expecting 60 in Tax & IT but got 50 and 49 and failed. BTW I am a very good student while my buddy is above average. Belive i am not saying this with any arrogance.

HELLOW,, MR PATHAN IS CORRECT. ICAI MUST ANS FOR HIM. WHAT IS WRONG IN ASKING OUR OWN PAPERS AFTER THE VALAUVATION. WHY CANT WE USE THE VALUES FOR OUR NEXT ATTEMPT PREPARATIION. ICAI IS DOING INJUSTICE TO THE STUDNETS IN THIS REGARDS .........