Ca final may 14 ama query

849 views 2 replies

This is regarding the LP question asked (Refer Q. No. 3(b)) of the question paper, refer attachment). Suppose we calculate the hours required to produce 30 units of product X(3) (which comes to 180 hrs. and 120 hrs. for machining and assembly respectively), and reduce the minimum available hours for the remaining two products for each deptt. In such a case, we are able to formulate an LPP in two variables only (for products X(1) and X(2)). The solution becomes simpler, as otherwise, a third constraint i.e. x(3) = 30 will have to be added. Will such an approach be considered correct in the exam?

/editor_upload/961026175untitled.png

 

Replies (2)
Its perfect,not to worry,it was a six mark question

yup! in fact i did the same in the exams!

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
20 June 2026
Assistant Accounts Manager

Fintax Professionals

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
CA Article Trainee

Rahul Dang & Associates

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
29 June 2026
ACCOUNTANT

SANDEEP AASHISH & CO

Araria

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 June 2026
Article

SNCO

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 09 June 2026
Article Trainee

Numbertree LLP

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 29 June 2026
Article Assistant

Alvino Consultancy LLP

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
09 June 2026
Accounts Associate

S Madan and CO

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
10 June 2026
Senior Account Executive

JDS Advisory LLP

Ahmedabad

CA Inter

View Details