Was researching a few CA final results by having a look at the Top 3 rank holder marks.
In November 2010 which was the last exam under the old syllabus, the top ranker scored 60%
but under the new syallabus, the top ranker scored 75%
why is there such a big difference?
are the papers set differently such that it is more difficult to score under the old syllabus?
is the marking done differently?
| Originally posted by : Rajiv | ||
 |
Was researching a few CA final results by having a look at the Top 3 rank holder marks. In November 2010 which was the last exam under the old syllabus, the top ranker scored 60% but under the new syallabus, the top ranker scored 75% why is there such a big difference? are the papers set differently such that it is more difficult to score under the old syllabus? is the marking done differently? |
 |
but isn't it dat nov 2010 old syllabus had the higher percentage of people passing.. i guess just double of new syllabus..
Well the person who wrote in New Scheme must have been smarter.. Simple Fact..
| Originally posted by : Kushal | ||
|
|
Well the person who wrote in New Scheme must have been smarter.. Simple Fact.. |
|
so the new syllabus top ranker is 25% smarter than that of the old syllabus.
difficult to believe!
| Originally posted by : Kushal | ||
|
|
Well the person who wrote in New Scheme must have been smarter.. Simple Fact.. |
|
gr8 answer dude..
CAclubindia
