How was the paper ? How much weightage was given to amendments & case laws ?
CA Saurabh
(PRACTICE)
(1019 Points)
Replied 13 November 2016
CA Saurabh
(PRACTICE)
(1019 Points)
Replied 13 November 2016
sagar parakh
(Group 2 Cleared)
(317 Points)
Replied 13 November 2016
Anup Koshy
(CA Finalist)
(104 Points)
Replied 13 November 2016
It was a decent one...nothing out of the box..few new points along with the old one ..where few marks cud easily b scored based on normal knowledge about the provision...
Overall good paper..same in line with may 16....
Aswath Raman
(Audit Executive)
(285 Points)
Replied 13 November 2016
Well, well well! The paper was actully well set, one must admit. The marks were distrubuted in an unconventional manner and the questions were given much importance to amendments. The paper clearly is a departure from conventional DT papers which are helpful for crammers (don't take offense)!
The message is very loud and clear here. Expect the unexpected. Work hard and cover everything, from study material to case law books and all the way to RTPs. Paper may feel lengthy to those who have not practiced the problems well and thorough. Anticipatory bail - It was lengthy for me!
Overall, a nice paper to blow away the expectations of the average students. Somehow, I have a feeling that this is the tougest in the second group!
sarita kumari
(Accounts Executive)
(134 Points)
Replied 13 November 2016
Akhil
(Article assistant and CA Final student)
(63 Points)
Replied 13 November 2016
firstly afraid...then i started solving....went well. have to see
Thomas
(Student)
(315 Points)
Replied 13 November 2016
Made lots of silly mistakes. Second guessed myself before answering most of the questions and ended up writing the wrong answers almost everytime. :(
Anyone know answer for 7th question TDS salary?
MAYUR BIYANI
(Assistant Manager-Taxation & Accounts)
(142 Points)
Replied 13 November 2016