Today's Auditing Paper -
In CARO question, whether caro applicable to private ltd. company?
in Schedule VI question, whether provision for Proposed Divided required??
ds_82_2000 (56 Points)
05 November 2012Today's Auditing Paper -
In CARO question, whether caro applicable to private ltd. company?
in Schedule VI question, whether provision for Proposed Divided required??
S. AGGARWAL
(STUDENT)
(315 Points)
Replied 05 November 2012
Basant Jajoo
(CA)
(125 Points)
Replied 05 November 2012
ankit sarda
(Article Assistant)
(24 Points)
Replied 05 November 2012
Robin
(AUDITOR)
(854 Points)
Replied 05 November 2012
CARO IS APPLICABLE TO FOREIGN COMPANY AND ITS SUBSIDIRIES IN INDIA,
PROVISION IS REQUIRED AS CURRENT LIABILITIES. ONE SHOULD WRITE MEANING OF "CL" To justify the provision for proposed dividend.
CA Abhinav
(Chartered Accountant)
(496 Points)
Replied 05 November 2012
According to me, CARO is not applicable based on the assumption it doesn't me the criteria as stated in CARO 2003
Provision for dividend required as there is contradiction between AS & Revised schedule VI. Thus AS will overide the requirement of Schedule VI.
Those who are having Financial Reporting book of M P vijay kumar can confirm the P D provision on page no 959
Am reproducing text here.
"The following shall be disclosed separately:
a The amount of dividends for the period proposed to be distributed to equity and preference shareholders and the related amount per share
b Arrears of fixed cumulative dividends on perference shares
Therefore, schedule VI requires a mere disclosure of proposed dividend in the notes and doesn't require it to be treated as adjusting event (in the financial statements).
However, currently AS requires proposed dividend to be adjusted in the accounts and as Accounting standards override the requirement of schedule VI, proposed dividend should be treated as a provision, unless AS 4 is revised in this respect."
Deepak Dargad
(Chartered Accountant....)
(9787 Points)
Replied 05 November 2012
I think today also easy one
srinath
(ca final )
(73 Points)
Replied 05 November 2012
what is the answer for question 1 part 4 " revenue recognition.... nd btw caro not applicable.. since three conditions are satisified.. that is waht given in d question..
srinath
(ca final )
(73 Points)
Replied 05 November 2012
what is the answer for question 1 part 4" revenue recognition... i have WRONGLY RETURN ON AS1 " ACRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING"..
Joey Tribbiani
(fdg)
(2010 Points)
Replied 05 November 2012
was average paper today,if u r just watching the question and have not written the exam it will look easy.
CA AAMIR
(MANAGING DIRECTOR)
(35 Points)
Replied 05 November 2012
Deepak Dargad
(Chartered Accountant....)
(9787 Points)
Replied 05 November 2012
CARO applicable
and AS will prevail over Sch. VI, so provision required
sonal padia
(accounts taxation audit)
(21 Points)
Replied 05 November 2012
Whether spouses 'sister's' husband falls in the defination of relatives?
Deepak Dargad
(Chartered Accountant....)
(9787 Points)
Replied 05 November 2012
No, Not fall under definition of relatives
Giridhar S Karandikar
(Team Lead)
(7548 Points)
Replied 05 November 2012
The definitino of relative is being changed in the CA Act. Accordingly the definitin of relative should be as per AS-18. So spouses sisters husband will be closely related to the auditor.