Bank Interest Income...
ANAND KHATER (78 Points)
20 April 2020Plz..Reply with Suitable Notification or Circular!
ANAND KHATER (78 Points)
20 April 2020
Durga Prasad
(97 Points)
Replied 20 April 2020
CA Naveen Chand
(Chartered Accountant)
(12729 Points)
Replied 20 April 2020
INTEREST INCOME shall NOT be considered for the aggregate turnover for the COMPOSITION DEALERS and for determining of eligibility for composition .
and for others it shall be included .
Rajkumar Patel
(602 Points)
Replied 20 April 2020
sabyasachi mukherjee
(27579 Points)
Replied 20 April 2020
ANAND KHATER
(78 Points)
Replied 20 April 2020
Vinay Srivastava
(24 Points)
Replied 20 April 2020
Shivam RC
(Student)
(23683 Points)
Replied 20 April 2020
ANAND KHATER
(78 Points)
Replied 20 April 2020
Pankaj Rawat
(GST Practitioner)
(55052 Points)
Replied 20 April 2020
ANAND KHATER
(78 Points)
Replied 20 April 2020
Pankaj Rawat
(GST Practitioner)
(55052 Points)
Replied 20 April 2020
Shivam RC
(Student)
(23683 Points)
Replied 20 April 2020
sabyasachi mukherjee
(27579 Points)
Replied 20 April 2020
Vaibhav
(student)
(27 Points)
Replied 20 April 2020
As @ Shivam RC said, Yes, interest income is an exempt supply and therefore it's a supply of service.
But if you read for the 'supply' in the act, "Supply is defined to include all forms of supply of goods and/or services such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, license, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business. It also includes the importation of services for a consideration whether or not in the course or furtherance of business." As per the definition, supply has two main components
1. Consideration
2. should be in the course or furtherance of business.
In my opinion, as this person is exclusively engaged in supply of goods, saving account interest income earned by him, is in his personal capacity and not in the course or furtherance of business.
So, as per the meaning of supply given in the Act, for this person, saving interest income is Not "Supply".
As this is not 'supply' for him, there is no question of him engaged in the supply of services.
This my personal opinion, so please correct me if I'm wrong.