BAD news
FM has rejected ICAI's claim and 20 cr proposal of RBI is accepted
As per CA Amresh Vashist Face book
B.Prabhakaran
(Chartered accountant)
(163 Points)
Replied 19 March 2012
BAD news
FM has rejected ICAI's claim and 20 cr proposal of RBI is accepted
As per CA Amresh Vashist Face book
Suman Kumar Agrawal
(Chartered Accountants)
(226 Points)
Replied 19 March 2012
Ritesh
(Asst.Mgr.)
(164 Points)
Replied 19 March 2012
Dear All,Congrats Everyone For Loosing Bank Audits!!Now this time vote wisely or even select represenative wisely.Plz select represntatives like Mr. Amresh Vashisth or M.S Bhatia who atleast dosome thing for us.And everyone plz think before writing mails like" Kya CA Bank Audit se Roti Khata Hai"Plz understand bank audit fees covers 30% -50% for small practicioner thus it means a lot and big moderators dont understand this.Make sure before voting whom you need to vote as:-Mr. Uttam Prakash Agarwal :- Category 1 firm and wholly responsible for this mess.Mr Chopra:- central Auditor of bank thus no worries.Let me stop here but other council members are not different thus who understans your pain.
Back in the Game
(a)
(1273 Points)
Replied 19 March 2012
Our firm belongs to Category 3.Wat r our chances of getting bank Audit?
Nilesh
(CA)
(97 Points)
Replied 19 March 2012
Bank Branch Auditors' Panel for the year 2011-12 (sended by ICAI to RBI) |
||
CATEGORY |
TOTAL NO. OF FIRMS |
% |
I |
1440 |
5.48 |
II |
2402 |
9.14 |
III |
4095 |
15.59 |
IV |
18338 |
69.79 |
TOTAL |
26275 |
100.00 |
Pawan Singhal
(chartered accountant)
(655 Points)
Replied 19 March 2012
category 111 firm chances of getting audit only 15.59%.
CA ASHIT NATVERLAL DESAI
(Chartered Accountants - Proprietor)
(129 Points)
Replied 19 March 2012
Very Ture
We have to take care in next election and need to give VOTE to the right candidate
Union is there - but for own interest
what is the difference between samll and big firm. All are qualified from Same prestigious Institute
Do you believe that all the partners from big firm are going for audit every where?
What the hell is going on?
Bank Audit - No Allotment to samll firms
Tax Audit - 40 lac to 60 lac and now 1 cror
Very Poor Unity - Work for own interest rather than best stronger professional Institute
Ritesh
(Asst.Mgr.)
(164 Points)
Replied 20 March 2012
Yes, rightly someboy says....20% - 40% income of proprietorshiop firm comes from Bank Auit. Can category I / II firms refuse to accept auitd unless small firms r allotted . NO, they don't have the courage to do that. Institute always argues...few CAs ....or noboy ( freshers) is interested for the profession. Vrey funny. Now, SME firms...rely on regular professional work or go for jobs.
MANOJ DEVIDAS SAMPAT
(c.a)
(147 Points)
Replied 20 March 2012
SOLUTION TO THIS PROBLEM IS ALLOT ONLE ONE BRANCH PER FIRM EVERYONE WILL GET AUDIT
Arindam Saha
(PARTNER)
(25 Points)
Replied 20 March 2012
There is still no official confirmation from ICAI or RBI
piyush
(practice)
(22 Points)
Replied 20 March 2012
Is there any legal remedy available with institute ? Do the RBI has power to regulate the audit or they have the power to restrict the appointment of auditors ? Is the restriction on appointment of audit is in the interest of the public, shareholders or investors. The other countiries are trying to load the additional responsibilities on auditors and widening the scope of audit after lehmen brothers. Does RBI has taken the right stand by restricting the scope of audit ?
Pawan Singhal
(chartered accountant)
(655 Points)
Replied 20 March 2012
No we have no legal remidies to oppose the decision of Finance ministry.
CA Krishna Kumar C
(Practise)
(27 Points)
Replied 20 March 2012
Rajesh Kachrulalji Gatagat
(Partner)
(21 Points)
Replied 20 March 2012
Unless and until we get official confirmation about the same, there is no point in discussing the issue. Wait for some more time & things will be clear
Ritesh
(Asst.Mgr.)
(164 Points)
Replied 20 March 2012
Wait till 25 th March 2012...the dead line for all.Then we discuss what to do.
Landmark Judgments: Important Provisions of the EPF & ESI Act interpreted by the Honorable Supreme Court of India