A person who was consultant receiving professi0nal fees during the first half of the year became the CEO in the second half. He is identified as key management person. Kindly clarify whether the amount paid to him as consultant to be disclosed under AS 18.
Menu
As 18 - disclosure
Replies (5)
AS-18 Disclosure says:: " attention is focussed on transactions with the directors or similar
key management personnel of an enterprise """
Hence Disclosure is required in this regard
But as on the transaction date the said KMP is not a KMP at all.
| Originally posted by : pragadeeshkanna | ||
 |
But as on the transaction date the said KMP is not a KMP at all. |
 |
No disclosure is required in that case..
As per AS-18 """If there have been transactions between related parties, during the
existence of a relatedi party relationship the reporting enterprise should disclose....."""
So during first half he was not a related party so the consultant fee need not be disclosed in the note if I am correct.
Yes......
Recent Topic
- Gift recd from brother
- How to show Loan write off in DPT 3?
- Form 10E and Salary arrear
- LTCG U/S 54F. Sale of property plus sale of share
- Issue with ITR2 online utility for HUF
- TDS deducted by EPFO under wrong section
- Schedule SI in ITR-2
- What is the easy way to do CA- through foundation
- Schedule FA query for this AY 2026-27
- Business income source for husband and wife
Related Topics
CAclubindia
