appointment of an employee as a director

2227 views 15 replies

Hi ,

can an employee having shares in private company and drawing a monthly remuneration of 50,000 be appointed as a non executive director of the company.

thanks in advance

Replies (15)

Hello!

As per my views it is not possible. A non executive director is a director who does not have any pecuniary interest in the company other then his remuneration as a director. But in your case he is already a employee who is seeking salary from the co. as well as he is also a shareholder.  So, i dont think that it can be happened. Contrary view or further clarification are welcomed.

 

Nidhi Goel

Agree with NIdhi he can be appointed as executive director.

Hi



When an employee is appointed as director and he draw remuneration he/she wil come under executive category. Please make sure in filing of Form-32 with ROC.



Regards

Ofcouse he can be appointed as EXECUTIVE Director.

Thank you all,

The person was drawing salary of 40,000 per month and was aso a shareholder of the company, the then since 13.04.09 he was appointed as an independent non executive director of the company, and continued to draw the salary. the company was converted into a private company on 7.08.09.

now the annual return and balance sheet have been filed. in this case what are the wat is the remedy left. should form 32 and 23 be filed back date from the time of appointment .

kindly share the views as the matter is very urgent.

thanks

Today your company is a private company...and adoption of independent director definition which is specifically drafted for a listed entity through Listing Agreements is not a good idea...


According to me and in general (for a pvt company) a director can be an independent NED, even if he is drawing (Transparency is maintained) salary for his work as an employee. So there is no need to repair anything.


Thanks 

Originally posted by : Ankur Garg

Today your company is a private company...and adoption of independent director definition which is specifically drafted for a listed entity through Listing Agreements is not a good idea...





According to me and in general (for a pvt company) a director can be an independent NED, even if he is drawing (Transparency is maintained) salary for his work as an employee. So there is no need to repair anything.





Thanks 
 

sir wont the provisions of section 314 be attracted, and when he was appointed it was a public company .

Yes 314 will be applicable...Infact section 314 (1) applicable i.e post approval of SHs through special resolution. All you need to do is---arrange SR in a GM...Plz go through first proviso of section 314(1)(b)...

 

Hope am not missing anything...Share your contrary view plz...

its not much clear, sir

other members may also share views

Well in my opinion Ankur Sir is absolutely right, you have to file form 23 for a special resolution under Section 314 of the Companies Act, 1956 in any General meeting held between his date of Appointment and date of Conversion of Public Company into Private.

 

But one thing I would like to ask you whether you have filed form 32 of Director with designation as Additional director or Director, if filed as Director then have you regularized him in the AGM of the Financial year 2008-2009.

 

Even if u missed this point, I think you need to file only form 23 for SR from back date to rectify your mistake.

 

Contrary opinions, are most welcomed…….

If he is employee of the Company how can we designate him as Non Executive Director of the Company. The definition defines Non Executive Director not Non Executive Directors for Listed Companies.

 

Simply, Non Executive Director means the Director who is not in the whole time employment of the Company.

 

Therefore, in my opinion they must be appointed as Executive Director or they should not continue as employee and appointed as NED.

Originally posted by : CS Ankur Srivastava

If he is employee of the Company how can we designate him as Non Executive Director of the Company. The definition defines Non Executive Director not Non Executive Directors for Listed Companies.

 

Simply, Non Executive Director means the Director who is not in the whole time employment of the Company.

 

Therefore, in my opinion they must be appointed as Executive Director or they should not continue as employee and appointed as NED.

well he is a doctor so may draw salary in his professional capacity, so we can appoint him as a director.

Originally posted by : CS Ankur Srivastava


Simply, Non Executive Director means the Director who is not in the whole time employment of the Company.

DISAGREE...It is for whole time director and not for Non Executive Director...

NED means a director not drawing salary as a director. A person drawing salary in his professional capacity as an employee may be designated as NED as long as he is not drawing salary as director.

Well this is my personal opinion.

As per the discussion and detailed analysis, i think there are two options left to correct the mistake

1. either to show the person as WTD from the day of his appointment and file 32,25C, and 23 and then revise the AR as well,


or

2. since the company has been converted into a private company just after 3 months of his appointment as a director, and chances of scrutiny are less, so from current year i shud file 32 and 25 C with change in designation.

also in case of any scrutiny the max. liabilty arising shall be redeposit of the salary to teh compani's account.

kindly suggest


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register