Dear sir,
As per IT Act,1961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conditions for claiming depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets must be owned and used for the purpose of business or profession
|
|
|
|
during the Previous year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stress -Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial ownership is more important than legal ownership.
|
|
|
Assessee need not be a registered owner, even a beneficial owner
|
|
|
can claim depreciation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-owner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In case of joint ownership, depreciation is allowed on proportionate basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property acquired on hire purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In case of hire purchase, the buyer can claim depreciation eventhough
|
|
|
he does not get legal title of the asset till he pays the last instalment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditure on a property by the lessee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where an assessee being a lessee of a property incurs any capital expenditure
|
|
by way of improvement,extension,super construction etc., on a building being used for
|
|
his business or profession, he is entitled to depreciation in respect of such capital
|
|
expenditure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sec.53A of transfer of property act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Possessor of an immovable proprty u/s. 53A of transfer of property act
|
|
|
can claim depreciation eventhough he is not the registered owner of the property.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the case of CIT V.Mohd.Bux shokat ali (HC)
The question related to allowing the depreciation on the vehicles in the assessment of the firm where the vehicles were not registered in the name of the assessee-firm but were registered in the name of one of the partneres of the firm.
The tribunal refused to refer the question while rejecting the application u/s.256(1).
On reference, the highcourt following the SC decision in case of mysore minerals ltd V. CIT (SC) declined to require the tribunal to refer to the aforesaid question of law to court notwithstanding that it was a question of law.
In this case, SC held that,
It is well settled that there cannot be two owners of the property simultaneously and in the same sense of the term.
The intention of the legislature in enacting sec.32 of the IT Act would be best fulfilled by allowing deduction in respect of depreciation to the person in whom for the time being vests the dominion over the building and who is entitled to use it in his own right and is using the same for the purpose of his business or profession.
Assigning any different meaning would not subserve the legislation intent.
So, the depreciation is allowable even when the same is registered in the name of partner, if the same is used for firm business purposes.
Stress:
A.O will Disallow some portion due to personal use.
Regards
K.Ilayaraja.