glidor@gmail.com
21068 Points
Joined January 2010
| Originally posted by : future ca |
 |
it means you r not against the corruption. one who is not against the corruption is with the corruption |
 |
not always true, but when we put finger to anybody without knowing self, then we forget that 3 fingers are turned to us, in exchange of 1 finger to the person in front.
charity begins at home, let the person get true with his taxes, then look in the matter of others.
what we feel or see is not always true, it may be legal under certain circumstances,
an example related to his query
say the person has three kids, all are abroad, and person is sending some money to them, by way of official banking chanels or through other chanels, viz thomos cook, western union or any.
what is the understanding of us, is he eligible to do so, or not?
Income Tax and FEMA both are diff cases (money laundering has its own act), but the person is interested to push "income tax raids" on the so called victim.
yes, he is eligible to send money to foreign, or eligible to receive money from overseas, and it does not bar anywhere under incometax, but in FEMA
whaqt would happen if incometax raids it? incometax has its own limitations, and they will book case for evasion, and after compliance of act, the case would get condoned........finish ...........
unless we are mature enough to judge the victim, its not wise ro jump of any conclusion ......
and who is with corruption and who is against.............its not to be judged with public forum scraps, let it go with public, and ids without name even have got power to push critics, thats the beauty of public forum.
Keep it up 