A doubt in tax s.44

Sec.44 regarding insurance business clarifies that  "any expenditure which is not admissible under sec.30 to 43B is disallowed under First Schedule read with S.44." 

But in the case, GIC of India vs.CIT, Supreme Court has held that "amount set apart is not an expenditure and therefore the question of disallowing what is not an expenditure does not arise", whereas u/s.40A(7), amount set as provision for payment of gratuity is disallowed.

what is the correct interpretation of the above 3 statements.

plz clarify..

Replies (2)

Hi Sharadha,

 

Section 30 to 43B talks about specific expenditure which needs to be dealt with accordingly.

 

As per decision quoted Amt set aside is not an expenditure but is an appropriation for contingencies like transfer to genreal reserve whereas Amt set aside to meet the obligation of gratuity payable is certain and there is specific section 40A(7) which deals with the same.

 

Also Specific provision has overriding effect over general provision.

 

Thanks & Regards

 

Hitesh

 

 

 

THANK U HITESH..

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
19 August 2026
PAID ARTCILE ASSISTANT

My Legal Tax Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
14 August 2026
Semi Qualified

Goyanka & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
07 August 2026
Chartered Accountant

Devesh Garg and co

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 26 August 2026
Article Assistant

ANIVESH CONSULTANTS LLP

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 10 August 2026
Article Assistant

Suraj Garg and Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
06 August 2026
Sr accounts executive, Asst Manager

JAMNA AUTO INDUSTRIES LTD

Jamshedpur

CA Inter

View Details
Company
25 August 2026
Senior Accountant

MG Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
11 August 2026
Chartered Accountant

Aviv Global Pvt Ltd

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details