Articleship is one of the most important phases in a CA student's life. While on one hand, the practical experience gained by students during their articleship period is of utmost significance, the underlying problem that students face to make their financial ends meet during that 3-year long period, cannot be denied.
Currently, the articleship stipend as fixed by ICAI is as follows:
|
Classification of the normal place of service of the articled assistant |
Stipend Payable per Month |
||
|
During the First Year of Training |
During the Second Year of Training |
During the Remaining Period of Training |
|
|
Cities/Towns having a population of 20 lakhs and above |
Rs. 4000 |
Rs. 5000 |
Rs. 6000 |
|
Cities/Towns having a population of 4 lakhs and above but less than 20 lakhs |
Rs. 3000 |
Rs. 4000 |
Rs. 5000 |
|
Cities/Towns having a population of less than 4 lakhs |
Rs. 2000 |
Rs. 3000 |
Rs. 4000 |
Needless to say, with the current economic scenario, this stipend is inadequate to meet a student's travel expenses, let alone its monthly necessities.
With a recent Tweet by CA Dinesh Wadera, the forgotten conversation of a CA Student's stipend amount has once again taken the limelight. In the Tweet, Mr Wadera adequately points out why there is a dire need to increase the minimum stipend amount by ICAI, in order to raise the standard of a CA Practice.
Rightly so, hundreds of students and professionals joined the conversation and pointed out the various difficulties faced by students due to insufficient stipend. Highlighting some of those reasons below:
A Twitter user wrote how the stipend amount did not cover his basic food expenditure and highlighted the grass-root difficulties faced by students.
In another Tweet, a user wrote 'Despite giving years to hardwork, determination and nothing less, CA articles are underrated nowadays'
Another user wrote, 'Under the guise of "training", there is an intelligent 19-20 year old that works for 8-12 hrs. a day for 5-6 days a week. How is 5k a fair remuneration? There is not 'training'. These kids are actually working! They need to be paid better than 20rs/hr'
The other side of the spectrum
While hundreds of students agreed that the minimum stipend amount should increase, others felt that the stipend amount is actually at par with the amount of work done and there is no need to increase the same. Highlighting some of those arguments below:
A Twitter user wrote 'I'm a student and I don't buy this argument at all. Students are getting polluted for money. I don't think money should be a criteria. True students get into CA firms to LEARN work and NOT TO EARN money.'
Another professional wrote 'Stipend is not salary and articles are not employees. Right from excel to Tally, we teach them from scratch. It's painful to teach. Plus we have to accommodate them for exams which we don't do for regular employees.'
So which end of the spectrum are you leaning towards, in this argument? To increase or not to increase? Let me know in the comments section below!
CAclubindia
