Section 40A(3): No Disallowance for Excessive Payments If Business Expediency and Party Genuineness Are Established



Quick Summary
Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act may lead to disallowance of excessive payments made in cash. However, this disallowance can be avoided if the assessee can demonstrate that the payments were made out of business expediency and that the parties involved were genuine. This involves proving that the payments were essential for the business to continue without disruption, especially in unpredictable situations or when dealing with suppliers who hold significant leverage.

Excessive payment u/s 40A(3) are not disallowed in case it can be established as follows-

  1. Payments have to be made for the assessee's business to not suffer or be hampered.
  2. Expenses that are sometimes not predictable or planned
  3. Expenses are extremely essential
Section 40A(3): Avoid Disallowance for Excessive Payments

The nature of the assessee's business is varied and no two events are comparable. Hence it was laid down in the case of SHRI MUNISH ARORA Vs THE ACIT [2024- VIL-1543-ITAT-CHD] that where due to business compulsions when the events are taking place, payments have been made to specified persons in spite of all constraints as they were holding an event to ransom and could have caused immense damage to the assessee's Goodwill and the assessee thereafter fired these people; the same would not be disallowed.

In Goenka Agencies vs Commissioner of Income Tax on 12 May, 2003 Equivalent citations: V (2003) 184 CTR Cal 104, 2003 263 ITR 145 Cal, it was held that-

 

"the identity of the payee who was an income tax assessee was established and the genuineness of the transactions was not doubted or disputed. It was held that the circular of the Board was not exhaustive but only illustrative. It was further held that the Income-tax Officer had to take a pragmatic view of the matter The Income Tax Officer should take a practical approach to problems and strike a balance between the direction of law and hardship to the assesses. He should not enmesh himself in technicalities. After all, the object is not to deprive the assessee of the deduction which he is otherwise entitled to claim. Where the amount was paid in cash or received in cash, the Assessing Officer has to find out whether the transaction is genuine or not and if he finds that the transaction is genuine, he should allow the deduction. The circular of the Board is not exhaustive, it is only illustrative and the Assessing Officer has to take into account the surrounding circumstances, considerations of business expediency and the facts of each particular case in exercising his discretion either in favour or against the assessee."

 

However, the following needs to be demonstrated -

  1. Business expediency
  2. Identity of parties
  3. Genuineness of parties

FAQ :

Excessive payments are not disallowed under Section 40A(3) if it can be established that the payments were made out of business expediency and the genuineness of the parties involved is proven.

Business expediency means that payments had to be made for the assessee's business to avoid suffering or being hampered, especially for expenses that were unpredictable or extremely essential.

Genuineness is established by proving the identity of the payee as an income tax assessee and ensuring the transaction is not doubted or disputed, considering surrounding circumstances and practical aspects.

The Assessing Officer must take a pragmatic and practical view, balancing the law's direction with potential hardship to the assessee, and should allow deductions if a transaction is found to be genuine.

No, the Board's circulars are considered illustrative, not exhaustive. The Assessing Officer must consider the specific facts, surrounding circumstances, and business expediency of each case.




About the Author

DESIGNATED PARTNER

Mr. Vivek Jalan is a FCA, Qualified LL.M (Constitutional Law) and LL.B. He is the Chairman of The Fiscal Affairs and Taxation Committee of The Bengal Chamber of Commerce and Industry. He is the Convenor on Indirect Taxes of the CII- Economic Affairs and Taxation Committee (ER); He is also a visiting faculty for Indirec ... Read more

Comments :

Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro

CCI Articles

submit article