Section 40A(3): No Disallowance for Excessive Payments If Business Expediency and Party Genuineness Are Established



Excessive payment u/s 40A(3) are not disallowed in case it can be established as follows-

  1. Payments have to be made for the assessee's business to not suffer or be hampered.
  2. Expenses that are sometimes not predictable or planned
  3. Expenses are extremely essential
Section 40A(3): No Disallowance for Excessive Payments If Business Expediency and Party Genuineness Are Established

The nature of the assessee's business is varied and no two events are comparable. Hence it was laid down in the case of SHRI MUNISH ARORA Vs THE ACIT [2024- VIL-1543-ITAT-CHD] that where due to business compulsions when the events are taking place, payments have been made to specified persons in spite of all constraints as they were holding an event to ransom and could have caused immense damage to the assessee's Goodwill and the assessee thereafter fired these people; the same would not be disallowed.

In Goenka Agencies vs Commissioner of Income Tax on 12 May, 2003 Equivalent citations: V (2003) 184 CTR Cal 104, 2003 263 ITR 145 Cal, it was held that-

 

"the identity of the payee who was an income tax assessee was established and the genuineness of the transactions was not doubted or disputed. It was held that the circular of the Board was not exhaustive but only illustrative. It was further held that the Income-tax Officer had to take a pragmatic view of the matter The Income Tax Officer should take a practical approach to problems and strike a balance between the direction of law and hardship to the assesses. He should not enmesh himself in technicalities. After all, the object is not to deprive the assessee of the deduction which he is otherwise entitled to claim. Where the amount was paid in cash or received in cash, the Assessing Officer has to find out whether the transaction is genuine or not and if he finds that the transaction is genuine, he should allow the deduction. The circular of the Board is not exhaustive, it is only illustrative and the Assessing Officer has to take into account the surrounding circumstances, considerations of business expediency and the facts of each particular case in exercising his discretion either in favour or against the assessee."

 

However, the following needs to be demonstrated -

  1. Business expediency
  2. Identity of parties
  3. Genuineness of parties



Published by


DESIGNATED PARTNER

Mr. Vivek Jalan is a FCA, Qualified LL.M (Constitutional Law) and LL.B. He is the Chairman of The Fiscal Affairs and Taxation Committee of The Bengal Chamber of Commerce and Industry. He is the Convenor on Indirect Taxes of the CII- Economic Affairs and Taxation Committee (ER); He is also a visiting faculty for Indirec .. Read more

CCI Pro

Comments


Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news

CCI Articles

submit article


Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Article Trainee

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details