The Supreme Court has tightened the rule against the drawers of cheques, which are dishonoured for want of sufficient balance in the bank account. They cannot avoid service of notice by the payee by making themselves scarce, according to the judgment, C C Alavi Haji vs Palapetty Muhammed.
It explained: “Any drawer who claims that he did not receive the notice sent by post, can, within 15 days of receipt of summons from the court make payment of the cheque amount and submit to the court that he had made payment and therefore the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is liable to be rejected. A person who does not pay within 15 days cannot obviously contend that there was no proper service of notice by ignoring the statutory presumption under the General Clauses Act and the Evidence Act.”
Once the payee dispatches the notice by registered post with correct address of the drawer of the cheque, the requirement of notice under the above Acts stands complied with and it could be presumed that the drawer got notice. Otherwise, unscrupulous elements would dodge notice and make it impossible for the authorities to prosecute them.
Comments
Related Articles
Popular Articles
- GSTR-9: Common Challenges in Filing
- Changes and Compliances in GSTR 9 & 9C for FY 2023-24
- Advance is taxable in the year of receipt
- Income Tax Implications on Sale of Property
- A Comprehensive Analysis of Section 61 of the CGST Act, 2017
- Virtual Digital Assets can be treated as Capital Assets and Exemption can be claimed u/s 54F - ITAT Jodhpur
- Major GST Compliance Updates for 2025: Mandatory MFA, E-Way Bill Restrictions and More
- Key Deadlines to remember in the month of December!
Trending Online Classes
-
6 days Certification Course on GST Practical Return Filing Process
CA Pratibha Goyal16 December 2024
CAclubindia
