CMA Ramesh Krishnan's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 26053

Hi.I am Ramesh Krishnan, Associate Memeber of ICWAI & Certified Management Accountant (CMA) by IMA(USA) Working in Bangalore

Award Winner as " Most effective Expert in Caclubindia-2011" My working style always like,

Take life always as challenge,Think positive,

Give involvement on taken task,Donot divert your concentration from the taken task,

Always target your goals and commitment,Your future always better. Jai hind. Thank you for visiting my profile

To reach me : cma.rameshkrishnan @ gmail.com or send PM for queries & professional help

What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?

My area of expertise

My experience in the area (years):

Organizations I belong to:

Publications or writing which has appeared :

Educational credentials:

Award & Honors:

Nitin says : related to TAX saving
Hi I am working as Contractor with Software company and my consultant charges are 7.5L per annum . From April to mar 2013 I can pay approx. 75-80K as TDS. Can you please clarify Is I am eligible to file for tax returns. and where can I invest so that to get my deducted amount back . I am planning to take Insurance Jan 2013 of preminum 50K per year. Ques: If I pay 50K in 2013 to Insurance , how much I will get from deducted amount . 2) Can I file the Room Agreement papers . If I paid 15K*12 = 180000 as room rent How much I can get from this : Total : Investment 50K(insurance) 1.8K(room rent) Tax deducted 80 K How much I can get back to my account :) Thanks in advance

Raju K H says : income tax rules for a y 2012-13
my Email.id thimmarajukh@gmail.com

dhansukh morabia says : income tax practioners
i am accountant. pass i am working co-op bank. 15 year service.i am appear in income tax office a.y. 1997-98,1998-99 & a.y.2005-06 three years as a bank manager/accountant.i am eligible for income tax

CA J.P.Gandhi says : VAT
TRATMEMENT OF SALES RETURN AND CST RETURN INCLUDING TAX IN FORM NO 231 AND CST FORM

Shruti Mishra says : Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c)
The assessing officer, appeal & ITAT i.e at all levels, income u/s 68 has been added to the declared income of the assesee.. this is done without appreciating & considering the facts of the case.. A notice u/s 143 (3) also has been issued for reassesment.. Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c) has been levied. is the contention of the A.O correct in imposing liabilty... ?? If NO , then can u provide some case laws which stand by the same...