see..undoubtedly,, registry plays an important role to claim an asset as got transferred..
but, whereas an agreement (wRITTEN ONLY)has taken place to the effect the transfer of the property. & ALSO THE POSSESSION HAS BEEN OBTAINED BY THE TRANSFEREE(BUYER)..CAPITAL GAIN should arise in the hands of the assessee in the year of agreement itself....THE POINT IS WHEN THE TRANSFEREE HAS GOT THE POSSESSION..?/
THAT IS THE TAXABLE EVENT IN TERMS OF SECTION 53A OF TRANSFER OF PROPERTIES ACT, 1882.
In Nathulal v. Phool Chand Supreme Court while interpreting Section 53-A culled out the following conditions to be fulfilled for making out the defence of part performance to an action in ejectment by the owner, as under:-
(i) that the transferor has contracted to transfer for consideration any immovable property by writing signed by him or on his behalf from which the terms necessary to constitute the transfer can be ascertained with reasonable certainty;
(ii) that the transferee has, in part performance of the contract, taken possession of the property or any part thereof, or the transferee, being already in possession continues in possession in part performance of the contract;
(iii) that the transferee has done some act in furtherance of the contract; and
(iv) that the transferee has performed or is willing to perform his part of the contract.
rEGARDS-
ABHIRAM